Australia Wide Delivery

How Government Talks About Autism: Identity-First Language

By Lion Med Supplies Editorial 2 min read

Words carry weight in this area, and the way a family, a clinician, or a government talks about autism sends a signal. This short article explains the language convention this pillar follows, why it exists, and why a different convention is equally valid. It is an editorial note rather than a rule anyone else has to adopt.

Two conventions

There are two common ways to phrase things. Identity-first language puts the identity first: Autistic person, Autistic people. Person-first language puts the person first: person with autism. Both are in wide use, and both are used by people who care about getting it right.

The difference is not really about grammar. Identity-first language reflects a view, held by many Autistic people, that being Autistic is a part of who someone is rather than a condition bolted on. Person-first language reflects a different instinct, common across disability more broadly, that the person should come before any label. Neither instinct is wrong.

What the government does

Australian government sources use identity-first language when they talk about the National Autism Strategy. Their own guidance is explicit that they will use the terms Autistic person and Autistic people. It is also careful to note the range of views in the community: some people prefer identity-first language, some prefer person-first language, and some are comfortable with either.

That last point is the important one. The government does not present its choice as the only correct answer; it presents it as the convention it has adopted, while acknowledging that people differ.

Why this hub follows it

This pillar uses identity-first language to match the source material it draws on. Because the National Autism Strategy and the reform pages use Autistic person and Autistic people, following the same convention keeps this hub consistent with the government pages it links to. It is a choice about wording, made for consistency, and nothing more should be read into it.

The considerate habit, in any real conversation, is simpler than any rule: where a person or a family has told you how they prefer to be described, follow that. A house style is a default for general writing, not a reason to override someone’s own preference. The official National Autism Strategy language guidance sets out the government’s position in full.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is identity-first language?
Wording that puts the identity first, as in Autistic person or Autistic people. It reflects a view held by many in the Autistic community that being Autistic is part of who a person is, not a condition attached to them. It is the wording the government uses for the National Autism Strategy.
Is person-first language wrong?
No. Person-first language, such as person with autism, is widely used and respected. The Autistic community holds a range of views, and some people are comfortable with either. Neither form is a mistake; the considerate approach is to follow a person's own preference where it is known.
Why does this site use identity-first language?
To match the national source material this pillar draws on. The government uses identity-first language for the National Autism Strategy, so this hub follows the same convention for consistency. It is an editorial choice about wording, not a clinical or political statement.

Enjoyed this article?

Get updates like this straight to your inbox - new models, price drops, and rebate changes.

GE

Written by

Lion Med Supplies Editorial

Lion Med Supplies Editorial Team

Lion Med Supplies's editorial team researches and produces independent comparison content for Australian homeowners. All content is built from primary sources - manufacturer spec sheets, government program documentation, and installer pricing surveys - and reviewed for factual accuracy before publication.